Neuroendocrine differentiation in castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic diagnostic attempt

Riferimento: 
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2012 Sep;10(3):164-73.
Autori: 
Matei DV, Renne G, Pimentel M, Sandri MT, Zorzino L, Botteri E, De Cicco C, Musi G, Brescia A, Mazzoleni F, Tringali V, Detti S, de Cobelli O.
Fonte: 
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2012 Sep;10(3):164-73.
Anno: 
2012
Azione: 
Valutare il modello neuroendocrino (NE) modello nel carcinoma della prostata resistente alla castrazione (CRPC) può risultare utile nel selezionare potenziali agenti terapeutici mirati, come gli analoghi della somatostatina.
Target: 
Analoghi della somatostatina/carcinoma della prostata.

ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Assessing the neuroendocrine (NE) pattern in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) may prove useful in selecting potential responders to target therapies such as somatostatin analogues. The aim of this study was to define a panel of markers or examinations appropriate to characterize NE differentiation (NED).
METHODS:
Forty-seven patients with CRPC underwent a systematic diagnostic attempt to characterize the NE phenotype using a plasma blood test for chromogranin A (CgA) and immunohistochemical staining of needle biopsy-obtained specimens (CgA, somatostatin receptor 2 [SSTR2], Ki-67, and androgen receptors). In a subgroup of 26 patients, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy using (111)In-DTPA-d-Phe octreotide (octreotide scintigraphy; Octreoscan, Covidien, Hazelwood, MO) was also performed.
RESULTS:
NED was found in 85.1% of patients (if serum CgA, tissular CgA, and tissular SSTR2 were considered separately: 54%, 67%, and 58%, respectively). Only 15% of the 26-patient subgroup had an abnormal octreotide scintigraphy result. Although p-CgA and t-CgA were associated with more aggressive disease with a worse prognosis, patients with positive tissular SSTR2 staining had longer overall survival (OS).
CONCLUSION:
This systematic approach to explore the NED in a quite homogeneous group of patients with CRPC seems reproducible and appropriate. Further investigations are required to validate this panel and better characterize potential responders to targeted therapy.